The NCCP was delivered to the Australian Government in January 2020. Additional research designed to augment and cross-check previous scientific work is currently being completed.
The work included coordinating a large program of research and consultation to identify a smart, safe, effective and integrated suite of measures to control carp impacts. A key focus of this process was to explore the potential use of biocontrol.
Carp are a big problem. Various attempts have been made to control them – for decades – without much success. Now, a carp-specific virus, already present in over 30 countries, has the potential to reduce carp numbers in Australia by over 70%. Such a reduction would have dramatic benefits for water quality, aquatic vegetation, native fish, fishing and irrigation.
While the efficacy of the carp virus is well-proven, a lot of hard work is required to ensure it’s a good option for Australia and, if it is deployed in the fight against carp, that it's safe and effective.
Clear water in a small spot free of carp, Northern Macquarie Marshes Nature Reserve 2011. Image: Tom Rayner.
Our job, within the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, was to lead a $10.2-million planning process, on behalf of the Australian Government. In the National Carp Control Plan that we delivered to Government we made recommendations based on the evidence gained during our work.
Our key objectives were to:
- undertake research and development to address key knowledge gaps;
- better understand and manage risks around carp control;
- build community awareness and understanding of the proposal to release the carp virus;
- develop detailed strategies for carp control and subsequent clean-up; and,
- support national coordination on all elements of the NCCP’s development.
Native species are set to benefit from carp control. This Murray cod has a research tag fitted. Image: Tom Rayner.
The National Coordinator Terms of Reference can be found here.
The task was obviously complex and full of challenges. That's unsurprising, given the scale of the project, the sheer biomass of carp in our rivers, the overlapping environmental, economic, social and cultural factors, and the amount of legislation carp control touches.
To guide us through the process, we enlisted expert support in key areas. Their role was to provide advice, guide decision-making and oversee the NCCP. Working groups were also established in collaboration with the Environment and Invasives Committee (formerly Invasive Plants and Animals Committee) to provide input into communication and engagement activities, and contribute to development of the NCCP.
- The Science Advisory Group members are experts in aquatic ecology, fish virology/epidemiology, water management, social science, emergency response and human health.
- The Policy Advisory Group comprised policy specialists from each jurisdiction, and assisted with identifying and addressing legislative considerations. The role of the PAG has now been moved into existing national biosecurity forums.
- The Operations Working Group includes the NCCP ‘state leads’, who will contribute to the detail of the Plan itself.
- The Communications Working Group are comms experts focused on the successful engagement of the Australian community in controlling carp impacts.